2.4 Soil Exploration, Earth Pressure and Retaining Structures
2.4 Soil Exploration, Earth Pressure and Retaining Structures
Introduction to Geotechnical Site Characterization and Stability
Soil exploration is the systematic investigation of subsurface conditions to obtain critical information for safe and economical design of foundations, retaining structures, and earthworks.
Earth pressure theories provide the analytical framework for estimating lateral forces exerted by soil on structures like retaining walls, basement walls, and sheet piles.
Retaining structures are engineered systems designed to resist these lateral earth pressures and maintain the stability of soil masses at significantly different elevations.
This unit integrates field investigation techniques with theoretical analysis and practical design, forming a complete workflow from site understanding to structural stability assurance.
1. Soil Exploration: Methods, Planning, and Execution
1.1 Objectives and Planning of Soil Exploration
Primary Objectives:
Determine the nature and sequence of subsurface soil strata.
Obtain representative soil and rock samples for laboratory testing.
Determine the depth and location of groundwater table(s).
Identify problematic soils (expansive, collapsible, organic, liquefiable).
Assess in-situ engineering properties through field tests.
Planning Considerations:
Project Requirements: Type, magnitude, and sensitivity of the proposed structure.
Site Topography and Geology: Review of existing maps, aerial photos, and geological reports.
Exploration Program: Deciding the number, location, depth, and spacing of borings/tests.
Spacing: Typically 10-30 m for buildings, closer for heavy or sensitive structures.
Depth: Should extend to a depth where stress increase from the structure is insignificant (typically 1.5-2 times the footing width for buildings, or to competent bearing stratum).
1.2 Methods of Subsurface Exploration
Direct Methods (Visible Inspection):
Test Pits/Trenches: Provide direct visual examination of soil layers, stratification, and groundwater. Limited to shallow depths (3-5 m).
Open Excavations: Useful for large-scale projects like dams; allows large-scale sampling.
Semi-Direct Methods (Borings):
Auger Boring:
Hand Auger: Suitable for shallow depths (< 5 m) and soft soils.
Mechanical Auger (Hollow/Continuous Flight): Can reach greater depths; suitable for most soils except hard rock or gravel.
Wash Boring: Uses a chopping bit and water jetting to advance a casing. Fast but provides highly disturbed samples.
Rotary Drilling: Uses a rotating drill bit with circulating fluid (air, water, mud) to cut through soil and rock. Essential for rock coring and deep investigations.
Percussion Drilling: Uses repeated lifting and dropping of a heavy chisel bit. Effective for boulders, gravel, and hard rock.
Indirect Methods (Geophysical):
Seismic Refraction: Measures travel time of seismic waves to determine depth to bedrock and layer velocities.
Electrical Resistivity: Maps subsurface variations by measuring resistance to electrical current. Good for locating water tables, bedrock, and cavities.
Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR): Uses high-frequency radio waves to detect interfaces and objects in shallow subsurface.
1.3 Soil Sampling and Samplers
Objective: To obtain a representative sample with minimal disturbance for laboratory testing.
Types of Samples:
Disturbed Samples: Soil structure is destroyed. Used for index property tests (classification, water content, Atterberg limits). Obtained from split-spoon samplers or auger cuttings.
Undisturbed Samples: Soil structure, moisture content, and stress conditions are preserved as closely as possible. Required for strength, compressibility, and permeability tests.
Common Samplers
Split-Spoon Sampler (SPT Sampler):
A thick-walled, split cylinder driven into the soil.
Provides disturbed samples.
Used in conjunction with the Standard Penetration Test (SPT).
Recovery Ratio: R=Length of DriveLength of Sample Recovered. Should be > 85% for good recovery.
Thin-Walled Tube Sampler (Shelby Tube):
A seamless, thin-walled steel tube (Area Ratio < 10%).
Gently pushed (not driven) into cohesive soil to obtain undisturbed samples.
Area Ratio:
Ar=Di2Do2−Di2×100%
where, Do is outer diameter and Di is inner diameter. Lower Ar means less disturbance.
Piston Sampler: Incorporates a stationary piston at the sampler tip to prevent soil from entering during lowering, reducing disturbance in soft clays.
1.4 Common Field Tests
Standard Penetration Test (SPT):
Procedure: Drive a standard split-spoon sampler a distance of 450 mm (18 in) using a 63.5 kg hammer falling 760 mm. Record the number of blows (N) for the last 300 mm of penetration.
Corrected N-value (N60): Corrects for field efficiency, rod length, borehole diameter, and sampling method.
Uses: Correlates to relative density (sands), consistency (clays), and estimates bearing capacity and settlement.
Cone Penetration Test (CPT):
Procedure: A conical tip (60°, 10 cm² area) is pushed continuously into the ground at a constant rate (2 cm/s). Measures tip resistance (qc) and sleeve friction (fs).
Friction Ratio: Rf=qcfs×100% (helps identify soil type).
Piezocone (CPTU): Also measures pore water pressure (u).
Advantages: Continuous profile, fast, repeatable, no borehole required.
Vane Shear Test (VST):
Procedure: A four-bladed vane is inserted into soft clay and rotated. The torque required to cause failure is measured.
Calculations: su=KT, where K is a vane constant based on its dimensions.
Purpose: Determines in-situ undrained shear strength (su) of soft to medium clays.
Plate Load Test (PLT):
Procedure: A rigid steel plate is placed at foundation level and loaded incrementally. Settlement is recorded for each load increment.
Purpose: Determines bearing capacity and settlement characteristics of the soil in-situ.
1.5 Site Investigation Report
A comprehensive document summarizing all findings. Key components include:
Introduction: Scope and purpose of investigation.
Site Description: Location, topography, access.
Field Exploration Program: Methods used, boring locations, depths, dates.
Subsurface Profile: Description of soil/rock strata, graphical logs for each boring.
Groundwater Conditions: Observed water levels, seasonal variations.
Field Test Results: SPT N-values, CPT profiles, VST results.
Laboratory Test Results: Summary tables of index, strength, and compressibility properties.
Analysis and Interpretation: Discussion of soil behavior, design parameters recommended.
Conclusions and Recommendations: Suitability of site, recommended foundation type (shallow/deep), bearing capacity, estimated settlement, special precautions (dewatering, excavation support).
2. Earth Pressure Theories
2.1 Lateral Earth Pressure States
The lateral pressure (σh) exerted by soil on a retaining structure depends on the wall movement relative to the backfill.
Three Fundamental States:
At-Rest Earth Pressure (K0):
Occurs when the wall is rigid and does not move (e.g., basement wall, bridge abutment).
Coefficient of Earth Pressure at Rest: K0=σv′σh′
For normally consolidated soils: K0≈1−sinϕ′ (Jaky's formula).
For overconsolidated soils: K0(OC)≈K0(NC)⋅(OCR)sinϕ′.
Active Earth Pressure (Ka):
Occurs when the wall moves away from the soil mass sufficiently.
Soil reaches a state of plastic equilibrium, mobilizing its shear strength.
This is the minimum possible lateral pressure.
Passive Earth Pressure (Kp):
Occurs when the wall moves into the soil mass sufficiently.
Soil is compressed and sheared, offering maximum resistance.
This is the maximum possible lateral pressure.
2.2 Rankine's Earth Pressure Theory (1857)
Assumptions: Soil is homogeneous, isotropic, cohesionless, the wall is frictionless (smooth) and vertical, and the ground surface is horizontal.
Active Earth Pressure Coefficient:
Ka=1+sinϕ1−sinϕ=tan2(45∘−2ϕ)
Pressure Distribution (for a cohesionless soil): σa=Kaσv=Kaγz
Passive Earth Pressure Coefficient:
Kp=1−sinϕ1+sinϕ=tan2(45∘+2ϕ)
Pressure Distribution: σp=Kpσv=Kpγz
For Cohesive Soils (c-ϕ soil):
Active Pressure: σa=Kaγz−2cKa
Passive Pressure: σp=Kpγz+2cKp
Tension Crack Depth (zc): zc=γKa2c. In design, tension is usually ignored, and pressure is taken as zero from surface to zc.
2.3 Coulomb's Earth Pressure Theory (1776)
Advantage over Rankine: Considers wall friction (δ) and sloping backfill (β).
Based on force equilibrium of a failing soil wedge.
Active Earth Pressure Coefficient:
Ka=cos2θ⋅cos(δ+θ)[1+cos(δ+θ)cos(θ−β)sin(δ+ϕ)sin(ϕ−β)]2cos2(ϕ−θ)
where, θ is the wall inclination from vertical.
Passive Earth Pressure Coefficient (Similar form, different sign conventions).
Total Active Force per unit length:
Pa=21KaγH2
Acts at H/3 from the base for triangular pressure distribution.
Direction of Force: Inclined at an angle δ to the normal of the wall.
3. Stability Analysis of Retaining Walls
3.1 Types of Retaining Walls
Gravity Walls: Rely on their own mass for stability (stone masonry, plain concrete). Usually massive.
Cantilever Walls: Reinforced concrete walls consisting of a vertical stem and a base slab (heel and toe). Most common for heights up to 6-8 m.
Counterfort/Buttress Walls: Similar to cantilever but have thin vertical ribs (counterforts behind the wall or buttresses in front) to reduce bending moments. Used for greater heights (>8 m).
Sheet Pile Walls: Thin, interlocking sections driven into the ground. Used for waterfront structures and temporary excavations.
Anchored/Braced Walls: Walls supported by anchors (ties) or braces to increase stability against high pressures.
3.2 Failure Modes and Stability Checks
A retaining wall must be checked against the following potential failure modes:
1. Overturning Failure
Mechanism: Wall rotates about its toe due to lateral earth pressure.
Factor of Safety (FOS):
FOSoverturning=∑Overturning Moments about Toe∑Resisting Moments about Toe≥1.5−2.0
2. Sliding Failure
Mechanism: Wall translates horizontally due to lateral force.
Resistance: Provided by base friction and/or passive resistance at the toe (shear key).
Factor of Safety (FOS):
FOSsliding=∑Driving Horizontal Forces∑Resisting Horizontal Forces≥1.5
∑Resisting Forces=(∑V)⋅tanδb+cb⋅B+Pp where, ∑V is total vertical force, δb is wall-soil base friction angle, cb is soil-wall base adhesion, B is base width, Pp is passive force at toe.
3. Bearing Capacity Failure
Mechanism: Soil beneath the toe fails in shear due to excessive vertical pressure.
Procedure: Calculate the maximum and minimum pressure (qmax,qmin) at the base using eccentricity formulas.
Eccentricity (e):
e=2B−∑V∑MR−∑MO
Must have e≤B/6 to avoid tension under the base.
Soil Pressure (for e≤B/6):
qmax,min=B∑V(1±B6e)
Factor of Safety (FOS):
FOSbearing=qmaxqult≥3.0
where, qult is the ultimate bearing capacity of the foundation soil.
4. Deep-Seated Shear (Overall Stability) Failure
Mechanism: A slip surface passes beneath the wall and behind it, involving a large soil mass. Common in weak soils.
Analysis Method: Slope stability analysis (e.g., Method of Slices, Bishop's method, using software). Check for circular or non-circular failure surfaces.
5. Internal Failure (Structural Checks)
Mechanism: Failure of the wall material itself (concrete crushing, steel yielding).
Analysis: Structural design of stem, heel, and toe slabs for bending moment and shear force, following reinforced concrete design codes.
4. Techniques to Increase Stability of Retaining Walls
4.1 Geometric Modifications
Increase Base Width (B): Directly increases resisting moments and reduces base pressure.
Use a Sloping Backfill: Reduces the active earth pressure coefficient (Ka) according to Coulomb's theory. A surcharge slope (β) is beneficial.
Provide a Toe Projection: Extends the lever arm for resisting moments against overturning.
Batter the Wall Face: Inclining the wall face into the backfill (negative batter) engages more wall friction and can reduce pressure.
4.2 Soil Improvement and Reinforcement
Use of Cohesionless Backfill: Draining, free-draining materials (sand, gravel) have higher ϕ and lower lateral pressure. They also prevent buildup of pore water pressure.
Provision of Drainage: This is the single most effective measure.
Weep Holes: Perforated pipes through the wall stem near its base.
Drainage Blanket: A layer of granular material behind the wall with a perforated collector pipe at the base.
Prevents hydrostatic pressure, which can double the lateral force.
Shear Key: A projection from the base slab into the underlying soil, engaging passive resistance to increase sliding resistance.
4.3 External Support Systems
Counterforts/Buttresses: Connect the stem to the base slab, reducing the unsupported span of the stem and base, allowing for a thinner, more efficient section.
Tiebacks/Ground Anchors: High-strength tendons drilled and grouted into the soil/rock behind the wall, then tensioned and connected to the wall. They provide an external resisting force.
Struts/Braces: Horizontal members placed between opposing walls in excavations. Common in temporary works like braced sheet pile walls.
4.4 Specialized Wall Systems
Reinforced Soil Walls (Mechanically Stabilized Earth - MSE): Uses horizontal layers of tensile reinforcement (geogrids, strips) within the soil mass to create a coherent, stable gravity structure.
Gabion Walls: Wire mesh boxes filled with rock. Flexible, permeable, and good for erosion control.
Crib Walls: Interlocking structural frames (timber, concrete) filled with granular material. Permeable and can tolerate some settlement.
4.5 Construction and Maintenance Considerations
Proper Compaction: Backfill should be compacted in thin lifts to desired density. Over-compaction near the wall can induce excessive lateral pressures.
Staged Construction: For high walls or weak foundations, construct and backfill in stages to allow for consolidation and strength gain.
Joints and Waterproofing: Provide construction joints and proper drainage to prevent water ingress and frost damage.
Monitoring: Install instrumentation (inclinometers, settlement markers) for critical walls to monitor performance during and after construction.
Summary and Design Synthesis
Soil exploration provides the essential data (stratigraphy, parameters, groundwater) that feeds into earth pressure calculations.
Earth pressure theory (Rankine/Coulomb) translates soil properties into design loads on the retaining structure.
Stability analysis ensures the proposed wall geometry is safe against overturning, sliding, bearing, and overall failure.
Stability enhancement techniques are integral to efficient design, often making an otherwise unstable section viable.
The final design is an iterative process balancing geotechnical safety, structural efficiency, constructability, and cost.
A well-investigated site and a rigorously analyzed design are the cornerstones of a safe and durable retaining structure.
Last updated